MLS tieback for P&A operations
28 September 2023We're working on the design and planning of the decommissioning (P&A) of some MLS suspended wells. For tieback from the MLS we're evaluating what the best approach would be and our assessment comes to a single string from the 9 5/8" production casing with a HW tieback string to the rig.
Most offset operations however show multiple string tied back with three or even four strings, including a conductor pipe.
What is in your view the benefit of tying back multiple, or all, strings? And what would be the drawback of the single string approach?
0 Answer(s)
PLEASE LOGIN OR SIGN UP TO JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Support Spread
We need the support of our members to keep our forum online. If you find the information on spread useful please consider a donation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/926e4/926e4cc9e6af91f7ed9045348ca009bb2e064a27" alt="donate"
Posted by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb25b/cb25b1bdd721d679499054d3f1bc4459233190a8" alt="Kornelius Boersma"
Kornelius Boersma
Senior Well Engineer
Discussions: 1
Replies: 2
Related Discussions
Mudline Conversion to Subsea Production (incl. HPHT)
Tieback a SG-1 wellhead with Jack up
MLS Wash-ports: To open or not, that is the question
30 in conductor protection of Mud Line Suspension
Contingency Hanger for Mud Line Suspension
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07998/0799833e3e12b3582a973f724a33414c5b59dba7" alt="drillers.com"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87dda/87ddaa5727fb99899b5914c9266ddf97b515b114" alt="rp2"